February 27, 2006
Pontiac Excitement Sweeps Search Engines (And exposes a major flaw)
Picture it - Superbowl Sunday. There's a huddle on the field and a huddle in the living room as my friends and I get ready for greatness of some kind. Some looked for greatness on the field, and some, like me, looked for it in the commercials. Imagine my surprise (I was almost GIDDY) when the tail end of a Pontiac commercial encouraged viewers to "see for themselves" by Googling "Pontiac".
Continue reading "Pontiac Excitement Sweeps Search Engines (And exposes a major flaw)"
Posted by | Full Entry
| Comments (0)
December 11, 2005
When Qualifying PPC Ad Management Firms, Budget Matters

Director Marketing Services Division
Partner Centric Inc
It's our pleasure to present unique insights from experts outside of affiliate marketing... stretching into practices of increasing importance such as paid search advertising. Count on AffiliateCluetrain to bring you unique insights from industry thought leaders like Heather Paulson.
One common yet troubling trend in the paid search advertising industry is for pay-per-click (PPC) or "paid search" management companies to charge advertisers based on the advertisers' costs associated with each engine or otherwise known as their PPC budget. When I received my Google qualified professionals certification I was included with a wide group of managers throughout the industry that had to face an important question: how to charge the advertisers for the service of managing their Google, Yahoo/Overture, and other paid search campaigns.
Continue reading "When Qualifying PPC Ad Management Firms, Budget Matters"
Posted by | Full Entry
| Comments (0)
September 29, 2005
More ways to search and syndicate
Need a search that only does news headlines, forums and Blogs? Need your RSS by....email... read on!
Continue reading "More ways to search and syndicate"
Posted by Chris Sanderson | Full Entry
| Comments (0)
September 19, 2005
Lego my trademark!
I've heard a lot about trademark bidding in the last, oh, year or so, as more and more affiliates - and merchants - have realized the goldmine in trademark pay-per-click (PPC) bidding. There are 2 schools of thought: let your affiliates bid on your trademark so that you get more coverage and squeeze your (presumably unscrupulous) competitors out, or don't let your affiliates bid and preserve the integrity of your trademarks while tracking the PPC revenue stream separately from the affiliate marketing stream.
Continue reading "Lego my trademark!"
Posted by | Full Entry
| Comments (4)
September 13, 2005
Sometimes a 60 hour work week is not enough!
I was recently reading a discussion on a forum about affiliates bidding on branded keywords. One AM offered up a couple of nifty solutions... either cap affiliate bidding for branded keywords at a certain price, or allow affiliates to bid on branded keywords as long as they bid below the merchant.
"That's a great idea!" was the response from another AM. A year ago, I would have agreed.
Continue reading "Sometimes a 60 hour work week is not enough!"
Posted by | Full Entry
| Comments (1)
August 15, 2005
The Problem with SEO for Marketers: Scale
Why don't marketers "do SEO" - often outsourcing it to affiliates? It can be expensive to hire a search agency and a hassle to interview them... only to find that the one you hired engages in so-called "black hat" techniques (those prohibited by major search engines) to trick search bots into ranking their pages higher. Sure, Marketing Sherpa makes it easy via their SEO firm buyers guide but let's face it, SEO as a do-it-yourself project, is not something that many marketers choose to get involved in... or do they?
Recent studies show that it's important for marketers, themselves, to optimize their many product pages. Why haven't they? It's painstakingly tedious and, even when outsourced to a SEO agency, expensive (again, due to time needed for the geeks to optimize your pages).
Continue reading "The Problem with SEO for Marketers: Scale"
Posted by Editor | Full Entry
| Comments (0)
May 05, 2005
Google, Yahoo Leave Advertiser Holding "Smoking Click Fraud Gun"
As reported by Catalog Age magazine, the CEO of executive air service CharterAuction says he's got clear evidence of click fraud against his company by a rival. Even though, he can't get major search engines to investigate his complaint properly, or to take action against the alleged perpetrator. The result? He's reducing his search engine marketing budget to about 5% of what it was two years ago.
Has anything changed for CharterAuction since being the lead story in the Wall Street Journal recently? Nope.
CEO Nate McKelvey describes his initial reaction to Google and Yahoo (Overture) crediting his account due to suspicious activity that, in the end, they were not willing to provide any evidence of beyond the fact that they considered it to be suspicious.
"Google didn't even offer me a refund... they credited my account, which I thought was peculiar," he says.
Continue reading "Google, Yahoo Leave Advertiser Holding "Smoking Click Fraud Gun""
Posted by Editor | Full Entry
| Comments (0)
March 15, 2005
Google & Overture: Lookin' Mighty Evil
Jeff Nienaber of Celebrate Express recently poppued up at Searchenginewatch to point out an interesting practice at Google and, in fact, Yahoo's Overture.
Google's editorial guidelines state:
"Links to your website must allow users to return to the Google search results page or ad network by clicking once on the browser's Back button."
Try circumventing this guideline and you will find your campaigns 'Disabled' within 5 minutes to 24 hours. It is a very important policy for their program - and for good reason.
However, if you manage millions of keywords and spend 6 or 7 figures a month you can circumvent this rule.
Case in point Bizrate/Shopzilla: Using IE, search Google for 'Price Compare' or virtually any keyword under the Sun, click on a Bizrate/Shopzilla ad, wait for the landing page to fully load, now click your browser's Back button once.
Is this an example of doing no evil?
Comments in the string included:
Maybe, but they do things differently when it's worth it. For instance, they offer sites with huge traffic different AdSense conditions to the rest of us.
Posted by Editor | Full Entry
| Comments (1)
March 08, 2005
Google Caught Cheating & Doc Searls Chimes In
Looks like Google is breaking its own rules - stuffing keywords into pages and such.
Also, Doc Searls has something to say about all this buzz surrounding Google's odd behavior lately. Doc says...
"... here's the problem: Google is an advertising company, more than a search company. That's becoming clearer with this feature, and the company's apparent lack of interest in the feedback they've been getting.
The problem for commercial media from the beginning has always been the separation of customers from consumers. (Which I've been writing and talking about for a long time.) This problem is worst where the consumers pay nothing. (This separates subscription media, where the consumers are customers, from broadcasting, where the consumers are not.)
Google's consumers pay nothing. Google consumers are very much, in this respect, like commercial broadcasting's consumers: powerless. They can't say 'I'll take my business elsewhere,' because they have no business to take.
Usage, maybe. But not business."
Posted by Editor | Full Entry
| Comments (0)
March 02, 2005
New Search Engine Targets Affiliate Clutter
Tired of all that affiliate-related clutter when you search for favorite brands at search engines? Bada-bing, bada-boom.... welcome to VisioBrand.
Read more here about this directory of major global brands. See if you can get the damn thing to work cause I sure can't. Very buggy but as you can imagine I'm bullish on it :)
Posted by Editor | Full Entry
| Comments (0)
February 25, 2005
Atlas DMT Offers Excellent Perspective on SEM
It's rare that I read something in DM News that's insightful of thought provoking and even more rare when I read someone from a company like AtlasDMT making a good point in a very articulate way. Yet, that's what happened this week with Nico Brooks' piece on how people search. Brooks is AtlasDMT's director of search technology. I encourage you to read the full article while you can (for free) as DM News locks it up after a few weeks.
His insights are certainly not Earth shattering but considering the fact that marketers are just now getting around to understanding (according to comScore and DoubleClick... and a few others) that people actually conduct research via search (before buying) this piece is valuable. Further, I find his use of examples to be wonderfully digestible and to the point.
Give it a read and let me know if it's as insightful as I think it is.
What's the action item that falls out of this? As Wayne Porter and I have, in private circles, discussed at length marketers who generate quality "informational content" that facilitates deep product/service research at - or along side of - their e-commerce offering are going to beat the competition every time. Getting there involves understanding precisely how customers go about their research. I suppose companies like comScore, and others, can assist in that regard.
Posted by Editor | Full Entry
| Comments (0)
|